Quote from badbiosvictim on May 25, 2022, 1:02 pm

Banfield implanted an American microchip and an international (euro) microchip into my puppy. Two weeks later, I read microchips are carcinogenic. My dog has two lumps very near where the microchips were implanted.

We are getting geolocated due to numerous RFID scanners erected in NYC and at highways, utility poles, toll bridges, etc.

Banfield and three vets refused to remove microchips. Vets naively believe the hype that passive microchips can only be read using the low powered cheap RFID readers. This Tuesday, a vet will take x-rays to pin point the microchips (microchips move) and perform surgery to remove the two lumps and two microchips.

Toll bridges have RFID readers which read all RFID chips.

Starting in 2008, RFID readers were erected along highways to geolocate vehicles, passengers and their pets. http://educate-yourself.org/pnl/rfidaeri...pr08.shtml

The RFID readers along highways, toll bridges can read 25 feet away and up to 55 mph. http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/20...chips.html

New York City secretly use RFID readers to scan population's E-Z Pass RFID transponders throughout NYC. http://tech-beta.slashdot.org/story/13/0...r-the-city

Department of Homeland Security issued grants to cities to erect a RFID/wifi/bluetooth reader (detector) to surveil entire population. The readers, combined with facial recognition cameras, are erected on utilities poles.

"As we have highlighted, this is just one of several examples of Big Brother spying apparatus being installed on the streets with barely a whimper of protest in comparison to the outrage that was prompted by the revelations of NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden.

Hi-tech street lights called Intellistreets that are linked via a ubiquitous wi-fi network and can record conversations are now popping up in major cities across the United States.

According to the company behind them, Intellistreets lighting systems can analyze voices, act as surveillance cameras and make loudspeaker security announcements. They also have the capability to track people who wear RFID tags. The fact that the lights are all linked back to a central data hub via a wi-fi network also mean they have the same capability to track people via their cellphone’s MAC address." http://spychippedplanet.com/2013/11/13/t...ll-phones/

The RFID/wifi/bluetooth/facial recognition camera boxes are erected on utility poles in Seattle, WA, NYC, Washington, DC, etc. http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Surve...34671.html

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-implant...iety/10097

"Last year, Broadcom introduced an RFID chip to be installed in “many models of [Google’s] Android phones” that could locate the user within a few centimeters, vertically and horizontally, indoors and out. . . In theory, the new chip can even determine what floor of a building you’re on, thanks to its ability to integrate information from the atmospheric pressure sensor.” http://www.occupycorporatism.com/cia-par...7x6Ah.dpuf

Jigsaw Positioning System (JPS) "The US Air Force (USAF) has contracted Locata to employ their non-GPS technology called Jigsaw Positioning System (JPS) which is slated will revolutionize locator-tracking abilities with the utilization of ground-based transmitters. RPS uses radio-frequency to provide accurate location coordinates." http://www.occupycorporatism.com/cia-par...7x6Ah.dpuf

Spy satellites track microchips. The majority of spy satellites are commercial. They are owned by corporations. Facebook purchased a satellite to geolocate its customers' cell phones and microchips.

http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/hea...ancer.aspx

http://www.antichips.com/faq/html/faq-section03.html

CANCER AND CHIP IMPLANTS

Q. Have implanted microchips caused cancer in animals?

Yes. In a series of scientific studies published between 1996 and 2006, researchers found a link between implanted

microchip transponders and cancer in laboratory animals. Between 1% and 10% of mice and rats implanted with the

chips for identification purposes were later afflicted with sarcomas, fibrosarcomas, and other invasive cancers

surrounding or attached to the implants. The fast-growing, malignant tumors often metastasized (spread) to internal

organs, lymph nodes, and musculature and frequently resulted in the death of the animals.

In two confirmed cases—and possibly many more—dogs have also developed cancer surrounding or attached to microchip

implants used for identification purposes. graphics1

graphics2 graphics3

Photos of microchip-induced tumors

Left: A malignant tumor found surrounding a microchip implanted in a mouse (Le Calvez et al, 2006) Right: Cross-

section of a malignant tumor found surrounding a microchip implant in a rat (Elcock et al, 2001)

Q. Did the microchip implants cause the tumors?

Yes. In nearly all cases, researchers concluded that the microchip implants induced (caused) the malignant tumors

found in their studies. Here are some quotes from the scientists involved with the studies:

"The transponders were the cause of the tumors." 8

Retired toxicologic pathologist Dr. Keith Johnson, in a phone interview with the Associated Press on the

findings of a 1996 study he led at the Dow Chemical Co. in Midland, Michigan.

"There was an unequivocal [unmistakable] association between the [microchip implant] and sarcoma." 9

Dr. Kerry Blanchard and colleagues from their 1999 study finding that 10.2% of mice studied developed cancer

around the microchips (p. 526)

The tumors "are clearly due to the implanted microchips." 10

Dr. Thomas Tillmann and colleagues, from their 1997 study that found cancers around microchips in 0.8% percent

of 4,279 chipped mice (p. 200)

Q. Where did the tumors form in the animals?

In all cases, the cancerous tumors were located at the site of the microchip. The tumors either encased the

microchip or were immediately adjacent to it. When scientists examined the tumors microscopically, they found that

the tumors originated in the capsule of tissue that formed around the microchips.

"All tumors were observed...at or near the implantation site...[the tumors] were attached to the implant or

partially or totally encased the implant." 11

Palmer et al. on their 1998 study that found malignant fibrosarcomas in 2% of 800 mice studied (p. 170)

"The intact microchip was found completely embedded within the [malignant] mass. " 12

Vascellari et al, from their 2004 study that found cancer in a dog (p.188)

Numerous other studies reached the same conclusions. These studies, detailing the formation of cancer surrounding

microchip implants, are described in detail in our comprehensive review of the research titled "Microchip-Induced

Tumors in Laboratory Rodents and Dogs: A Review of the Literature 1990–2006." 13

Q. How does the microchip implant cause cancer?

Researchers have proposed several explanations for the cancerous tumors found around microchip implants in animals,

as follows:

Foreign-Body Tumorigenesis: The presence of a foreign body under the skin may cause cellular changes that lead

to cancer.

Post-Injection Sarcoma : Inflammation from the chip-injection procedure may give rise to cancer.

Possible Genotoxic Properties of the Implant : The microchip may have carcinogenic properties or cause the body

to produce carcinogenic byproducts.

Radio-Frequency Energy Emissions from the Transponder or Reader : The radio-frequency energy involved with the

device may contribute to tumor formation.

Each of these hypotheses is addressed in greater detail in our comprehensive report on the research titled

"Microchip-Induced Tumors in Laboratory Rodents and Dogs: A Review of the Literature 1990–2006."14 However, we

currently don't know which, if any, of these hypotheses is correct.

Q. Are the microchips that caused tumors the same as the VeriChip human implant?

Yes, the microchips that caused cancer in animals are virtually identical to the implant being marketed for humans.

Digital Angel, the parent company of the VeriChip Corporation, manufactures both the HomeAgain® animal implant and

the VeriChip human implant. Both of these devices can be seen in the photograph below.

The microchip at the top is the VeriChip human implant, currently implanted in hundreds of human beings. The

microchip below it is the HomeAgain® pet implant, the device that was found encased within a cancerous tumor

(liposarcoma) in one dog, and adjacent to a cancerous tumor (fibrosarcoma) in another dog.

graphics4

The only significant difference between the animal microchip and the VeriChip human implant is in the information

coded onto their internal microchips. Animal implants generally transmit a 10-digit ID number, while the human

implant is encoded to transmit a 16-digit ID number.

The microchips that induced cancer in laboratory animals were sold by BioMedic Data Systems, Inc., but are also

nearly identical to the VeriChip human implant. Both contain a microchip and an antenna sealed in a 12 mm cylinder

of medical-grade glass. Both are partially encased in a polypropylene anti-migration sheath. Both are injected into

the flesh with a 12-gauge needle.

Human and Animal Implants Compared Left: A VeriChip human implant manufactured by Digital Angel appears at the top of this photo. Directly below it is

Digital Angel's animal chip, marketed under the HomeAgain® brand name in the U.S., and other brand names overseas.

A grain of rice and a dime are shown for scale.

Q. I'd like to examine the evidence myself. Where can I find the original research studies?

The studies were originally published in a variety of pathology, veterinary and toxicology journals between 1996

and 2006. The author of this FAQ, Katherine Albrecht, Ed.D., has authored a comprehensive, 52-page report on the

studies that has been posted on the AntiChips.com website and is freely available for distribution.15 In addition,

we have scanned the full text of the original research articles and made them available on our website.16

Q. Should humans be worried about developing cancer from microchip implants?

The fact that rodents and dogs have developed cancer around implanted microchips does not necessarily mean that

humans will do the same. However, prior research indicates that humans are subject to malignant tumors in response

to foreign-body implants. In a small number of cases, highly aggressive sarcomas and carcinomas have developed in

humans around pacemakers and other implanted devices.

Most of the malignant, microchip-induced tumors found in rodents were classified as sarcomas – soft tissue cancers.

Although soft tissue sarcomas are rare in humans, they are responsible for more deaths than testicular cancer,

Hodgkin's disease, and thyroid cancer combined. They are also notorious for recurring and metastasizing—often with

devastating results.

It should be noted that the same company that manufactures the VeriChip human implant also produced and sold the

virtually identical microchips that were associated with cancer in dogs.

Since the microchip implant procedure has only been performed on humans since 2001, and only in a small number of

individuals, very little is known about the long-term response to the implant in human beings. According to several

people who have received implants, the VeriChip Corporation had no formal follow-up procedure in place to monitor

patient response to the devices.

http://www.rense.com/general80/instri.htm

"It gets worse. Katherine Albrecht authored a report called "Microchip-Cancer Report - Microchip-Induced Tumors in

Laboratory Rodents and Dogs: A Review of the Literature 1990-2006." After reading it, Dr. Robert Benezra, Director

Cancer Biology, Genetics Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center said: "There's no way in the world, having

read this information, that I would have one of those chips implanted in my skin, or in one of my family members.

Given the preliminary animal data, it looks to me that there's definitely cause for concern."

Albrecht's report evaluated 11 previously published toxicology and pathology studies. In six of them, up to 10.2%

of rats and mice developed malignant tumors (typically sarcomas) where microchips were implanted. Two others

reported the same findings for dogs. These tumors spread fast and "often led to the death of the afflicted animals.

In many cases, the tumors metastasized and spread to other parts of the animals. The implants were unequivocally

identified as the cause of the cancers."

Report reviews, conclusions and recommendations were to immediately stop further human implantations, inform people

with them of the dangers, offer a microchip removal procedure, and reverse all animal microchipping mandates."

A photograph of my dog is at http://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/27..._remove_2/